Attention: Male Enhancement More Plates More Dates

With regard to looser communal structures such as IndieWeb’s, Richard’s Inclusive Communities of Practice Framework identifies that efforts to promote underrepresented cultural groups at a community level have worked to address individual factors, such as those related to social group identification and other sociocultural factors (Richard and Gray 2018). Action at a community level is likely to transcend what is possible through individual action when it comes to addressing diversity and inclusion. 2 expressed some reservation because he identifies as male but sometimes uses gender-neutral pronouns and has, in fact, considered gender carefully in relation to his own experience. In fact, for all the time invested in working on Yarns, the actual software will not be evaluated as an indicator of my scholarly qualifications. In fact, in the past Facebook has solicited work on a similar tool from software developer and open Web advocate Dave Winer (Ingram 2014a). In this case, it is unlikely that anyone at Facebook was specifically motivated to restrict services like Bridgy. When Facebook dramatically reduced that functionality in 2018 it was no longer deemed possible for Bridgy’s developers to maintain support for Facebook.



We get it all the time where people are like, "Oh I would love to do the stuff that you guys show at a demo." Like, okay yes, but the thing we just showed as a demo took three Web developers a month to put on and there’s no one-click installation. But from the perspective of people who use Bridgy on their own sites, POSSE offers a way to get the benefits of corporate social media while avoiding some of its downsides. E.g. weŕe deliberately avoiding that outcome by encouraging a plurality of projects. However, insofar as most IndieWeb projects identified on GitHub are built by individuals and Xtenze Plus Ingredients in small groups, decision-making about their development is characterized by decentralization. However, where there is a capacity for interpretive flexibility, there are both opportunities and requirements for decision-making. Is there any alternative for getting fantastic benefits at your age… This indicates that there is not a widespread tendency for individuals to blend the same combinations of topics in a given month. These terms were most prominently topics 4, 9 and 16, though were distributed relatively highly across other topics as well.



Several lists of key terms were generated to identify pre-defined topics of interest: Principles, IndieWeb standards, names of IndieWeb projects, and events. Figure 5.7 presents the distribution of terms related to IndieWeb’s technical standards across the topic model. The lowering of those barriers is not a move away from distinction between "creators and everybody else" but instead relates to IndieWeb’s technical foundation being established. With regard to topic clusters, both tables demonstrate similar patterns, with "IndieWeb building blocks", "Events" (from 2014-2015 onward), and "Web dev (general)" being consistent predictors of activity. Development-focused chat messages, such as those relating to "IndieWeb building blocks" and "Web dev (general)," and chat messages related to "events" were consistent predictors of both types of activities over time. I identify that chat activity is generally concentrated among a centre of extremely active participants, and that members of that centre are more likely also be active on GitHub. All of these patterns indicate that IndieWeb’s community has a centre of very active participants who are influential over both chat discussions and IndieWeb-related development activity on GitHub.



The independent variables are (1) The topic cluster assigned to each observation, with ‘no topic assigned’ excluded as a dummy category (2) the number of messages posted, Xtenze Plus Ingredients and (3) the betweenness centrality of the user in IndieWeb’s chat that month. However, Xtenze Plus Ingredients it is worth noting that most IndieWeb-related GitHub repositories had a small number of people who contributed by either committing code or discussing issues. However, Xtenze Plus Ingredients this strategy of focusing on problems that have been observed and documented within the community can lend momentum to biases. However, even as IndieWeb has become easier to use, it’s developer-centric origins cast a long shadow of informal technical barriers, which I will discuss presently. I also noted that technical barriers for participation intersected with barriers related to gender, race, and other dimensions of social privilege. Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that this is not likely to be a measurement of all participation in GitHub repositories related to IndieWeb, but rather a measurement of participation that could be linked using the methods described in Section 3.3.4. The 3.6% of chat users who were linked to activity on GitHub are those who (a) interacted with a GitHub repository that was captured in this study, (b) registered a personal URL on IndieWeb’s list of chat-names4, and (c) linked to their personal URL from their GitHub account, or to their GitHub account from their personal URL.